High-Impact Health Interventions
war-on-disease, 1-percent-treaty, medical-research, public-health, peace-dividend, decentralized-trials, dfda, dih, victory-bonds, health-economics, cost-benefit-analysis, clinical-trials, drug-development, regulatory-reform, military-spending, peace-economics, decentralized-governance, wishocracy, blockchain-governance, impact-investing
A dFDAcompetes with smallpox eradication as history’s best health intervention by ROI, cost per quality-adjusted life year, and total impact.

Note: The bar represents the mid-point of the uncertainty range, and the error bars indicate the lower and upper bounds of the estimate. For “Smallpox Eradication,” the upper bound is illustrative of its high, open-ended impact.
Comparison Table
Key
- ROI: Return on investment; dollars saved or value created per $1 spent.
- Cost per QALY Gained (ICER): Lower is better; “Dominant” means saves money and improves health. Values may be in USD ($) or GBP (£).
- QALYs Gained per $1M: Rough estimate, varies by context and population.
Conclusion
A decentralized drug assessment framework is projected to have a higher ROI and more QALYs per dollar than almost any other single health intervention, rivaled only by foundational public health measures like smallpox eradication and mass vaccination in low-resource settings. Most other interventions, while highly cost-effective, do not approach the systemic leverage or scale of such a framework.